Comparative analysis of the component composition of mature and buried wood
Abstract
The component composition of samples of mature and buried wood in peat deposits was studied. Differences in the component composition of buried wood samples are shown, indicating the heterogeneous nature of the deposit areas in terms of the botanical composition of peat-forming plants, the degree of decomposition, as well as different depths of the recovered samples. Samples of mature and buried wood were studied by IR spectroscopy. The spectra of the studied samples of buried wood are close to each other both in the set of absorption bands and in their intensity, which indicates similar chemical composition of the studied samples. The same fact is observed in case of the spectra of deciduous wood samples (birch, oak, alder). A comparative analysis of the IR spectra of buried and mature wood showed a difference in the absorption region of carbonyl groups (the band at 1732 cm–1, present in the spectra of mature coniferous wood (pellets)), is not observed in the spectrum of buried, which may be due to the interaction of these functional groups in buried wood with ions of ash elements of a peat deposit, it was established that the main processes of samples thermal decomposition occur in a rather narrow temperature range compared to peat – from 301 to 386 ºC, while 61 to 72 % of the organic mass decomposes, the maximum rate of thermolysis, is in the range of 358–362 ºC for both mature and buried wood, with the exception of oak, which has a temperature maximum at 347 ºC.
About the Authors
A. E. ThomsonBelarus
Alexey E. Tomson, Ph. D. (Chemistry), Assistant Professor, Deputy Director, Head of the Center, Head of Lab
Center of Peat and Sapropel; Lab of Ecotechnology
220076; 10, F. Skoriny Str.; Minsk
T. Yа. Tsaryuk
Belarus
Tatiana Ya. Tsaryuk, Ph. D. (Technical), Senior Researcher
220076; 10, F. Skoriny Str.; Minsk
T. V. Sokolova
Belarus
Tamara V. Sokolova, Ph. D. (Technical), Assistant Professor, Senior Researcher
220076; 10, F. Skoriny Str.; Minsk
V. S. Pekhtereva
Belarus
Victoriya S. Pekhtereva, Researcher
220076; 10, F. Skoriny Str.; Minsk
Yu. Yu. Navosha
Belarus
Yulian Yu. Navosha, Ph. D. (Physics and Mathematics), Leading Researcher
220076; 10, F. Skoriny Str.; Minsk
M. G. Kalantarov
Belarus
Mikhail G. Kalantarov, Ph. D. (Biology)
220076; 10, F. Skoriny Str.; Minsk
A. S. Marzan
Belarus
Anastasiya S. Marzan, Junior Researcher
220076; 10, F. Skoriny Str.; Minsk
I. P. Falyushina
Belarus
Irina P. Falyushyna, Researcher
220076; 10, F. Skoriny Str.; Minsk
References
1. Nushtaeva A. V. Khimiya drevesiny [Chemistry of wood]. Penza, Penza State University of Architecture and Construction, 2013, 100 р. (in Russian)
2. Fengel D., Grosser D. Chemische Zusammen von Nadel- und Lauholzern. HOLZ als Roh- und Werkstoff, 1975. vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 32–34.
3. Rakovskiy V. E., Pigulevskaya L. V. Khimiya i genezis torfa [Chemistry and genesis of peat]. Moscow, Nedra Publ., 1978, 230 p. (in Russian)
4. Murashkevich T. V. Izmenenie khimicheskikh svoystv lignina, drevesiny torfyanykh zalezhey [Changes in the chemical properties of lignin and peat wood]. Sbornik Nauchnykh trudov IFOKh AN BSSR [Proc. of the Institute of Organophysical Chemistry of the NAS of the BSSR]. Minsk, AN BSSR, 1961, no. 9, pp. 119. (in Russian)
5. Lishtvan I. I., Korol N. T. Osnovnye svoystva torfa i metody ikh opredeleniya [Basic properties of peat and methods for their determination]. Minsk, Nauka i Tekhnika Publ., 1975, 320 p. (in Russian)
6. Tyutkova E. A., Loskutov S. R., Shestakov N. P. IK-spektroskopiya drevesiny individualnykh godichnykh sloev [IR spectroscopy of wood of individual growth layers]. Khvoynye borealnye zony = Coniferous boreal areas, 2017, vol. XXXV, no. 3–4, pp. 61–67. (in Russian)
7. Pozhidaeva V. M., Retivov V. M., Panarina E. I., Sergeeva Ya. E., Zhdanovich O. A., Yatsishina E. B. Razrabotka metoda identifikatsii porody drevesiny v arkheologicheskikh materialakh metodom IK-spektroskopii [Development of a method for identifying wood species in archaeological materials using IR spectroscopy]. Zhurnal analiticheskoy khimii = Journal of Analytical Chemistry, 2019, vol. 74, no. 12, pp. 911–921. (in Russian)
8. Vichnevsky S., Fuhr B., Melnichuk J. Characterization of wood and non-wood mechanical pulps by differential thermal analysis. J. Pulp & Paper Sci., 2003, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 17–20.
9. Shen D. K., Gu S., Luo K. H., Bridgwater A. V., Fang M. X. Kinetic study on thermal decomposition of woods in oxidative environment. Fuel, 2009, vol. 88, pp. 1024–1030.
10. Sebio-Punal T., Naya S., Lopez-Beceiro J., Tarrio-Saaverda J., Artiaga R. Thermogravimetric analysis of wood, holocellulose, and lignin from five wood species. J. Therm. Anal. Calorim., 2012, vol. 109, no. 3, рр. 1163–1167.
11. Varhegyi G., Grоnli M. G., Di Blasi C. Effect of sample origin, extraction, and hot water washing on the devolatilization kinetics of chestnut wood. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 2004, vol. 43, рр. 2356–2367.
Review
For citations:
Thomson A.E., Tsaryuk T.Y., Sokolova T.V., Pekhtereva V.S., Navosha Yu.Yu., Kalantarov M.G., Marzan A.S., Falyushina I.P. Comparative analysis of the component composition of mature and buried wood. Nature Management. 2024;(1):144-153. (In Russ.)
JATS XML